Honeywell International Inc. v. Nokia Corp., No. 10-1121 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2010)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., and

HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellants,

v.

NOKIA CORPORATION, NOKIA INC., FUJITSU

LIMITED, FUJITSU AMERICA, INC., FUJITSU

COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF AMERICA, INC., ALL AROUND CO. LTD., BOE-HYDIS TECHNOLOGY

CO. LTD., PICVUE ELECTRONICS LIMITED,

CURITEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., KONINKLIJK

PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V., HIGH TECH

COMPUTER CORPORATION, WISTRON

CORPORATION, MATSUSHITA ELETRICAL

INDUSTRIAL CO., MATSUSHITA ELECTRONICAL

CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SEIKO EPSON

CORPORATION, ARGUS (also known as Hartford Computer Group.), TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., and

TOSHIBA CORPORATION,

Defendants,

and

FUJIFILM CORPORATION and FUJIFILM U.S.A.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA INC. and SAMSUNG SDI

2CO. LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2010-1121

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in consolidated Case Nos. 04-CV-1337, 04-CV-1338, 04-CV-1536, and 05-CV-0874, Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.

JUDGMENT

MARTIN R. LUECK, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were MATTHEW L. WOODS and STACIE E. OBERTS.

LAWRENCE ROSENTHAL, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellees Fujifilm Corporation, et al. With him on the brief were IAN G. DIBERNARDO, ANGIE M. HANKINS, and MATTHEW W. SIEGAL.

STEPHEN S. KORNICZKY, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for defendants-appellees Samsung SDI America Inc., et al.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: