Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

The Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Thermo-Ply, Inc., No. 10-1119 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1119
Decided
December 7, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit THE OHIO WILLOW WOOD COMPANY,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant,

v.

THERMO-PLY, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Cross Appellant,

and

COASTAL LINERS, LLC,

Counterclaimant-Appellee.

2010-1119, -1269

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 07-CV-0274, Judge Ron Clark.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY S. STANDLEY, Standley Law Group, LLP, of Dublin, Ohio, argued for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant. With him on the brief were JAMES L. KWAK, F. MICHAEL SPEED, JR. and MICHAEL R. STONEBROOK.

RICHARD E. FEE, Fee & Jeffries, P.A., of Tampa, Florida, argued for Defendant/Counrterclaimant-Cross Appellant, and Counterclaimant-Appellee. With him on the brief was KATHLEEN M. WADE.

2DAVID W. WICKLUND, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, of Toledo, Ohio, for amicus curiae. With him on the brief was RONALD A. CHRISTALDI, of Tampa, Florida. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 7, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

The Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Thermo-Ply, Inc., No. 10-1119 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1119-20111207
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1119-20111207

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.