Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Juniper Networks, Inc. v. SSL Services, LLC., No. 10-1107 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2010)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1107
Decided
December 13, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SSL SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1107

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Georgia in No. 08-CV-5758, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN S. KAGAN, Irell & Manella LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were MORGAN CHU and DAVID C. MCPHIE.

PAUL K. VICKREY, Niro, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were DINA M. HAYES and FREDERICK C. LANEY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 13, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Juniper Networks, Inc. v. SSL Services, LLC., No. 10-1107 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1107-20101213
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1107-20101213

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error