Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Minks v. Polaris IND., Inc., No. 10-1106 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2010)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1106
Decided
December 10, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FLOYD M. MINKS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

2010-1106, -1132

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in no. 05-CV-1894, Judge Gregory A. Presnell.

JUDGMENT

STEVEN L. BRANNOCK, Brannock & Humphries, of Tampa, Florida, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was SARAH C. PELLENBARG.

ANTHONY C. ROTH, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief was MICHELLE P. NGUYEN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER, and

GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 10, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Minks v. Polaris IND., Inc., No. 10-1106 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1106-20101210
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1106-20101210

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error