Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Atser Research Technologies, Inc. v. Raba-Kistner Consultants, Inc., No. 10-1088 (Fed. Cir. July 8, 2010)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1088
Decided
July 8, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ATSER RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RABA-KISTNER CONSULTANTS, INC., RABA-KISTNER

INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., RABA-KISTNER-ANDERSON

CONSULTANTS, INC. (formerly know as RABAKISTNER CONSULTANTS (SW), INC.), BRYTEST LABORATORIES, INC. (doing business as RABA-KISTNER-BRYTEST CONSULTANTS, INC.), and LONE STAR INFRASTRUCTURE, JOINT VENTURE,

Defendants-Appellees.

2010-1088

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District

of Texas in case no.SA-07-CV-093, Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth.

JUDGMENT

ERIC M. ADAMS, Mehaffy Weber P.C., of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

JOHN P. MORAN, Holland & Knight, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MOORE, Circuit

Judges).

2AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_July 8, 2010__ _/s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Atser Research Technologies, Inc. v. Raba-Kistner Consultants, Inc., No. 10-1088 (Fed. Cir. July 8, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1088-20100708
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1088-20100708

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error