Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Akazawa v. Link NEW Tech, Inc., No. 10-1077 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 18, 2010)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1077
Decided
October 18, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit AKIRA AKAZAWA and PALM CREST, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

LINK NEW TECH, INC.,

Defendant. 2010-1077

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 03-CV-1474, Judge James V. Selna.

JUDGMENT

R. JOSEPH TROJAN, Trojan Law Offices, of Beverly Hills, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Dylan C. Dang. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 18, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Akazawa v. Link NEW Tech, Inc., No. 10-1077 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 18, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1077-20101018
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1077-20101018

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error