Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Adams (Rule 36), No. 10-1074 (Fed. Cir. July 21, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1074
Decided
July 21, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
1 page

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE WILLIAM E. ADAMS

2010-1074

(Serial No. 10/873, 903)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of

Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

LYNN J. ALSTADT, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant.

JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and KRISTI L.R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_July 21, 20010 _/s/ Jan Horbaly_________ Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Adams (Rule 36), No. 10-1074 (Fed. Cir. July 21, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1074-20100721
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1074-20100721

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.