Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Diam USA, Inc., No. 10-1052 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1052
Decided
May 5, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2010-1052

SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC.,

Plaintiff/Cross Claim Defendant-Appellant,

v.

DIAM USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee, and

POP DISPLAYS USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam USA, Inc.),

Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and

POP DISPLAYS, LLC, POP DISPLAYS, INC., and

DIAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants, v.

TELEFONIX, INC.,

Cross Claim Plaintiff/Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

Richard D. Harris, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff/cross claim defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Herbert H. Finn, Kevin J. O’Shea, and Cameron M. Nelson. Lee F. Grossman, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for all appellees. With him on the brief was Mark M. Grossman, Grossman Law Offices, of Arlington, Illinois. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Judge Ronald A. Guzman

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2010-1052

SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC.,

Plaintiff/Cross Claim Defendant-Appellant,

v.

DIAM USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee, and

POP DISPLAYS USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam USA, Inc.),

Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and

POP DISPLAYS, LLC, POP DISPLAYS, INC., and

DIAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants,

v.

TELEFONIX, INC.,

Cross Claim Plaintiff/Third Party Defendant-Appellee. Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of

Illinois

In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-4857.

3This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly_________________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Diam USA, Inc., No. 10-1052 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1052-20100505
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1052-20100505

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.