Revolution Eyewear, Inc., v. Aspex Eyewear,Inc. (Rule 36), No. 10-1029 (Fed. Cir. July 21, 2010)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

REVOLUTION EYEWEAR, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

and

GARY MARTIN ZELMAN,

Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

v.

ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC. and NONU IFERGAN,

Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants.

2010-1029

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 03-CV-5965, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez.

JUDGMENT

R. JOSEPH TROJAN, Trojan Law Offices, of Beverly Hills, California, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee and counterclaim defendant-appellee.

MICHAEL A. NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellants. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: