Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Yahoo! Inc, No. 09-M906 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 1, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-M906
Decided
September 1, 2009
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Miscellaneous Docket No. 906

IN RE YAHOO! INC. and GOOGLE, INC.,

Petitioners. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 6:08-CV-509, Judge John Love.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Before SCHALL, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

QRDER

Google, inc. moves without opposition to withdraw its petition for a writ of mandamus and to vacate the July 10, 2009 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas denying petitioners’ motion to transfer venue. Google also indicates that Yahoo! Inc. is no longer participating in the case due to settlement.

Although we grant the motion to withdraw the petition for a writ of mandamus, we deem the better course is to require that the parties first move in the district court if they seek vacatur of the district court's order. See U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall P'ship, 513 U.S. 18, 29 (1994) (mootness by reason of settlement does not necessarily justify vacatur of a judgment under review; court of appeals may instead require that the matter be presented to the district court for consideration).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) | The motion to withdraw the petition is granted.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2(2) | The motion to vacate the district court's order regarding transfer is denied without prejudice to the parties requesting such relief from the district court.

FOR THE COURT

SEP -1 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Michael A. Jacobs, Esq.

Paul D. Clement, Esq. Eric M. Albritton, Esq. us,c ourt!L

iRead

er Judge, USDC E.D. Tex. Clerk, USDC E.D. Tex.

SEP ~1 2009

$19

JAN HURBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Yahoo! Inc, No. 09-M906 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 1, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-M906-20090901
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-M906-20090901

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.