Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Miller, No. 09-M890 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 5, 2009)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-M890
Decided
March 5, 2009
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 890

IN RE JOHN D. MILLER,

Petitioner.

On Writ of Mandamus from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

in case no. 06-0933, Judge Bruce E. Kasold.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Before NEWMAN, BRYSON, and DYK Circuit Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

ORDER

John D. Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus to direct the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to transmit his notice of appeal of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims' judgment in Miller v. DVA, No. 06-0933, to this court.

The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment on July 30, 2008. Miller filed a notice of appeal on September 29, 2008. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims issued its mandate on October 7, 2008. Miller then filed the instant mandamus petition seeking to require the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to transmit his notice of appeal to this court.

After Miller filed his mandamus petition, this court received Miller's appeal of the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in Miller v. DVA, No. 06-0933. Miller's appeal was docketed as appeal no. 2009-7027. Because Miller has received the relief sought in his mandamus petition, the petition is moot.

Accordingly,

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

MAR 0 5 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

FILED Clerk

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS F THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT OR John D. Miller

cc:(cid:9)

Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq. MAR 0 5 2009 Judge, CAVC

MN

Clerk, CAVC

CLERK

s17

Misc. 890(cid:9) 2

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Miller, No. 09-M890 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 5, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-M890-20090305
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-M890-20090305

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.