Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

California Human Development Corp. v. US, No. 09-5116 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-5116
Decided
June 9, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

2009-5116

Appeal from the United Stated Court of Federal Claims in case no. 05-CV-1029, Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.

JUDGMENT

GARY C. ADLER, Roetzel & Andress, LPA, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was CRAIG A. KOENIGS.

ROBERT C. BIGLER, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were TONY

2WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and BRYANT G. SNEE, Deputy Director. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 9, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

California Human Development Corp. v. US, No. 09-5116 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-5116-20100609
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-5116-20100609

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.