Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sensormatic Electronics Corporation v. WG Security Products, No. 09-1583 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2010)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1583
Decided
November 8, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WG SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC. and

EAS SENSORSENSE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2009-1583

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 04-CV-0167, Judge T. John Ward.

JUDGMENT

DONALD R. DUNNER, Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellants. With him on the brief was ANDREW J. VANCE. Of counsel was ERIK R. PUKNYS, of Palo Alto, California.

ROBERT R. WATERS, Waters Law Group, PLLC, of Louisville, Kentucky, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was ENRICO A. MAZZOLI. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (BRYSON, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sensormatic Electronics Corporation v. WG Security Products, No. 09-1583 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1583-20101108
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1583-20101108

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error