Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Rothe Development Corp. v. Dept. of Defense, No. 09-1565 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2010)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1565
Decided
May 4, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1565

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

Defendants-Appellees. David F. Barton, The Gardner Law Firm, of San Antonio, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Conor B. Dugan, Attorney, Appellate Section, Civil Rights Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General, Mark L. Gross and Lisa Wilson Edwards, Attorneys. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Judge Xavier Rodriguez

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1565

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 98-CV-1011 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 4, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Rothe Development Corp. v. Dept. of Defense, No. 09-1565 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1565-20100504
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1565-20100504

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error