Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

SRI International Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, Inc., No. 09-1562 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1562
Decided
November 5, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SRI INTERNATIONAL INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,

v.

INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. (a Delaware Corporation) and INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS,

INC. (a Georgia Corporation),

Defendants-Appellants,

and

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

2009-1562, -1575, 2010-1010

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 04-CV-1199, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

FRANK E. SCHERKENBACH, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-cross appellant. With him on the brief were HOWARD G. POLLACK and STEVEN C. CARLSON, of Redwood City, California; and CRAIG E. COUNTRYMAN, of San Diego, California.

DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants Internet Security Systems, Inc., et al. With him on the

2brief were PAUL D. CLEMENT; and HOLMES J. HAWKINS, III, NATASHA H. MOFFITT and CHARLES A. PANNELL, III, of Atlanta, Georgia.

ROBERT M. GALVIN, Howrey LLP, of East Palo Alto, California, argued for defendant-appellant Symantec Corporation. With him on the brief were PAUL S. GREWAL, RENEE DUBORD BROWN, GEOFFREY M. GODFREY and KATIE J.L. SCOTT. Of counsel on the brief was JOSEPH FITZGERALD, Symantec Corporation, of Mountain View, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SRI International Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, Inc., No. 09-1562 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1562-20101105
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1562-20101105

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.