Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership, No. 09-1523 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1523
Decided
May 6, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1523

TEKNOWLEDGE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a

VERIZON WIRELESS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Corby R. Vowell, Goldstein, Faucett & Prebeg, LLP, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Edward W. Goldstein. Kevin P. Anderson, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were James H. Wallace, Jr. and Karin A. Hessler. Of counsel on the brief was Joseph E. Addiego, III, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, of San Francisco, California. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Susan Illston

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1523

TEKNOWLEDGE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a

VERIZON WIRELESS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California

in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-03063 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MAYER, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 6, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership, No. 09-1523 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1523-20100506
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1523-20100506

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.