Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Storm Products v. Ebonite International, Inc., No. 09-1507 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1507
Decided
May 7, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1507

STORM PRODUCTS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

EBONITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

and EBONITE HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

H. Dickson Burton, TraskBritt, P.C., of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Krista Weber Powell and J. Jeffrey Gunn. Mark Vorder-Bruegge, Jr., Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP, of Memphis,2 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1507

STORM PRODUCTS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

EBONITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

and EBONITE HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Utah In CASE NO(S). 07-CV-00260 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 7, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly__________________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Footnotes

  1. Tennessee, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief was Matthew A. Williams, of Louisville, Kentuckey. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Utah Judge John L. Wagner

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Storm Products v. Ebonite International, Inc., No. 09-1507 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1507-20100507
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1507-20100507

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.