Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ceiva Logic, Inc. v. Frame Media, Inc., No. 09-1448 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1448
Decided
May 5, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1448

CEIVA LOGIC, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

FRAME MEDIA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendant. Gary A. Hecker, The Hecker Law Group, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was James M. Slominski. Allen S. Rugg, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Frame Media, Inc., were James J. Foster and Hunter D. Keeton. On the brief for Digital Spectrum Solutions, Inc., were Robert D. Fish and Andrew Mar, Fish & Associates, P.C., of Irvine, California. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge James V. Selna

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1448

CEIVA LOGIC, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FRAME MEDIA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the

Central District of California

in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-636. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MAYER, GAJARSA, and MOORE, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ceiva Logic, Inc. v. Frame Media, Inc., No. 09-1448 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1448-20100505
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1448-20100505

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.