Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Trueposition Inc., v. Andrew Corporation, No. 09-1389 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 12, 2010)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1389
Decided
August 12, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TRUEPOSITION INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ANDREW CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

2009-1389

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 05-CV-747, Judge Sue Robinson.

JUDGMENT

PAUL B. MILCETIC, Woodcock Washburn LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were GARY H. LEVIN, LYNN B. MORREALE and AMANDA M. KESSEL. Of counsel was JEREMY M. DUKMEN.

CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR., Sidley Austin LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was ROBERT N. HOCHMAN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and GAJARSA, Circuit

Judges).

2AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 12, 2010 _/s/ Jan Horbaly _______________ Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Trueposition Inc., v. Andrew Corporation, No. 09-1389 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 12, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1389-20100812
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1389-20100812

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error