Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

GED Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Durotech International, Inc., No. 09-1273 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1273
Decided
December 14, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1273, -1286

GED INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, INC.

and NEWELL OPERATING COMPANY (doing business as Ashland Products, Inc.),

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

DUROTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Thomas H. Shunk, Baker & Hostetler LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Stephen J. Schultz and George L. Pinchak, Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio. Timothy J. Monahan, Monahan & Moses, LLC, of Greenville, South Carolina, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Ray L. Weber and Laura J. Gentilcore, Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Taylor & Weber, LPA, of Akron, Ohio. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Judge John R. Adams

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1273,-1286

GED INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, INC.

and NEWELL OPERATING COMPANY (doing business as Ashland Products, Inc.), Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DUROTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Ohio

in CASE NO(S). 5:06-CV-1327. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MAYER, CLEVENGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED December 14, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

GED Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Durotech International, Inc., No. 09-1273 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1273-20091214
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1273-20091214

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.