Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Boss v. Cabilly, No. 09-1264 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1264
Decided
December 11, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1264

(Interference No. 105,531)

MICHAEL A. BOSS, JOHN H. KENTEN,

JOHN S. EMTAGE, and CLIVE R. WOOD,

Appellants,

v.

SHMUEL CABILLY, HERBERT L. HEYNEKER, WILLIAM E. HOLMES,

ARTHUR D. RIGGS, and RONALD B. WETZEL,

Appellees.

Doreen Yatko Trujillo, Cozen O’Connor P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellants. Meredith Martin Addy, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellees. With her on the brief were Thomas J. Filarski, Laura A. Lydigsen and Luke A. Parsons. Of counsel on the brief were Jeffrey P. Kushan, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, and Oliver R. Ashe, Jr., ASHE, P.C., of Reston, Virginia. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1264

(Interference No. 105,531)

MICHAEL A. BOSS, JOHN H. KENTEN,

JOHN S. EMTAGE, and CLIVE R. WOOD,

Appellants, v.

SHMUEL CABILLY, HERBERT L. HEYNEKER, WILLIAM E. HOLMES,

ARTHUR D. RIGGS, and RONALD B. WETZEL,

Appellees.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences In CASE NO(S). 105,531 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, ARCHER, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED _December 11, 2009 _____ _/s/ Jan Horbaly__________________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Boss v. Cabilly, No. 09-1264 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1264-20091211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1264-20091211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.