Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Global Traffic v. Tomar Electronics, No. 09-1220 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2009)

Dismissed
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1220
Decided
July 9, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1220

GLOBAL TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TOMAR ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

in case no. 05-CV-786, Chief Judge Michael J. Davis.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Tomar Electronics, Inc. moves without opposition to dismiss its appeal due to settlement.*

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted. Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

JUL 0 9 (cid:9) 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

P !LW Date Jan Horbaly

U.S. COURT OF A prztus

FOR Clerk THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc:(cid:9) David J.F. Gross, Esq.

Michael J. Schaengold, Esq.

JUL 0 9 2009 s17

JUL 0 9 2009

JAN HORBALY ISSUED AS A MANDATE: CLERK

Tomar requests that this dismissal be without prejudice; however, it is not the practice of this court to dismiss with or without prejudice.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Global Traffic v. Tomar Electronics, No. 09-1220 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1220-20090709
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1220-20090709

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error