Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Agfa-Gevaert N.V., No. 09-1212 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1212
Decided
November 9, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1212, -1236

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

AGFA-GEVAERT N.V. and AGFA CORPORATION,

Defendants-Cross Appellants.

Richard D. Rochford, Nixon Peabody LLP, of Rochester, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Michael F. Orman. H. Michael Hartmann, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Jeffrey B. Burgan, David M. Airan, and L. Scott Beall. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of New York Senior Judge Michael A. Telesca

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1212, -1236

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

AGFA-GEVAERT N.V. and AGFA CORPORATION,

Defendants-Cross Appellants. Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of New York In CASE NO(S). 02-CV-6564. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and WILKEN, District Judge.*).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED November 9, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

* The Honorable Claudia Wilken, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Agfa-Gevaert N.V., No. 09-1212 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1212-20091109
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1212-20091109

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.