Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. v. Kahle, No. 09-1193 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1193
Decided
February 17, 2010
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1193

SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

PHILIP VON KAHLE (Assignee for the benefit of the creditors of

The Tag Company US, LLC),

Defendant,

and

PHENIX LABEL COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

DENNIS GADONNEIX,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Florida in case no. 06-CV-81105, Judge Daniel T.K. Hurley.

O R D E R

Before BRYSON, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

The judgment in this case is affirmed. With respect to the inequitable conduct claim, we uphold the district court’s ruling of no inequitable conduct based on the court’s2 finding that the inventors did not act with the intent to deceive the Patent and Trademark Office; we do not address the question whether the information that was not disclosed was material. With respect to the public use issue, we uphold the district court’s conclusion that the appellant Phenix failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the invention was in public use more than one year before the filing date for the patent; we do not address the question whether any alleged use of the invention during the period prior to the filing date of the patent fell within the experimental use exception to the public use doctrine. FOR THE COURT

February 17, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Mark L. Levine Robert R. Waters

2009-1193 2

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sensormatic Electronics, LLC. v. Kahle, No. 09-1193 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1193-20100217
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1193-20100217

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.