Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Outside the BOX Innovations v. Travel Caddy, No. 09-1171 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2011)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1171
Decided
March 8, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
4 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. muiteb of §ppeals

~tates ~ourt

for !be jfe beral

~ircuit

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

OUTSIDE THE BOX INNOVATIONS, LLC (DOING

BUSINESS AS UNION RICH USA),

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

BONAKA LIMITED, BONAKA PLASTIC

MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., AND

UNION RICH PLASTIC FACTORY, LTD.,

Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees,

and

CHRISTOPHER URE, MATT WILLIAMS, TERRY

KINSKEY, AND LYNN MARTINEAU,

Counterclaim Defendants,

v.

TRAVEL CADDY, INC.,

Defendant/ Counterclaimant-Appellant.

and

ROOSTER PRODUCTS (DOING BUSINESS AS THE

ROOSTER GROUP),

Defendant / Counterclaimant.

2009-1171

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2OUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY 2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in case no. 1:05-CV-2482, Senior Judge Orinda D. Evans.

OUTSIDE THE BOX INNOVATIONS, LLC (DOING

BUSINESS AS UNION RICH USA),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

BONAKA LIMITED, BONAKA PLASTIC

MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., AND

UNION RICH PLASTIC FACTORY, LTD.,

Counterclaim Defendants,

and

CHRISTOPHER URE, MATT WILLIAMS, TERRY

KINSKEY, AND LYNN MARTINEAU,

Counterclaim Defendants,

v.

TRAVEL CADDY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

ROOSTER PRODUCTS (DOING BUSINESS AS THE

ROOSTER GROUP),

Defendant.

2009-1558

Figure on page 3 of the opinion

33 OUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in case no. 1:05-CV-2482, Senior Judge Orinda D. Evans.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Outside the Box Innovations, LLC moves without op position to dismiss its appeal, 2009-1558. Travel Caddy, Inc. moves without opposition for an extension of time, until March 24,2011, to file its reply brief in 2009-1171.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss 2009-1558 is granted. Each side shall bear its own costs in 2009-1558.

(2) The revised official caption for 2009-1171 IS re flected above.

(3) Travel Caddy's motion for an extension of time is granted.

FOR THE COURT

MAR 08 2011

/s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Robert Byer, Esq.

Timothy P. Maloney, Esq. Jeffrey D. Mills, Esq. coUJ~~JPEALS

U.S. FOIl

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

MAR 08 lOll JAN HORBAlY4 OUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY 4

Figure on page 4 of the opinion

s20

Issued As A Mandate (as to 2009-1558 only):

MAR 08 2011

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Outside the BOX Innovations v. Travel Caddy, No. 09-1171 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1171-20110308
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1171-20110308

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.