Fed. Cir.

Orthoarm, Inc. v. Forestadent USA, Inc., No. 09-1159 (Fed. Cir. July 7, 2009)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 09-1159
Decided: July 7, 2009
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1159

ORTHOARM, INC.

and G.A.C. INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

FORESTADENT USA, INC.

and DYNA FLEX, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Keith J. Grady, Polsinelli Shughart PC, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Graham L.W. Day and John M. Challis. Frederick L. Whitmer, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellees. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Judge Charles A. Shaw

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1159

ORTHOARM, INC.

and G.A.C. INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

FORESTADENT USA, INC.

and DYNA FLEX, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Missouri

in CASE NO(S). 4:06-CV-730 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED July 7, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Orthoarm, Inc. v. Forestadent USA, Inc., No. 09-1159 (Fed. Cir. July 7, 2009).

Record ID: CAFC-09-1159-20090707
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1159-20090707

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error