Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

IGT v. Alliance Gaming Corp., No. 09-1110 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 22, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1110
Decided
October 22, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1110

IGT,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

ALLIANCE GAMING CORPORATION, BALLY GAMING INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

and BALLY GAMING, INC. (doing business as Bally Gaming & Systems),

Defendants–Appellees.

Jeffrey W. Sarles, Mayer Brown LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Brent A. Batzer, Melissa A. Anyetei, Nathaniel Hamstra, and Andrea C. Hutchison. Charles K. Verhoeven, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Amy H. Candido, R. Tulloss Delk, and Eric Wall. Of counsel was Kevin A. Smith. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Nevada Judge Robert C. Jones

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1110

IGT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ALLIANCE GAMING CORPORATION, BALLY GAMING INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

And BALLY GAMING, INC. (doing business as Bally Gaming & Systems), Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in CASE NO(S). 2:04-CV-1676 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED October 22, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

IGT v. Alliance Gaming Corp., No. 09-1110 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 22, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1110-20091022
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1110-20091022

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.