Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Joyal Products, Inc. v. Johnson Electric North America, Inc., No. 09-1095 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 22, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1095
Decided
October 22, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1095

JOYAL PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

JOHNSON ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

JOHNSON ELECTRIC CONSULTING, INC.,

and JOHNSON ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTORY, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellants, and

DELPHI CORPORATION,

Defendant. Stephen R. Buckingham, Lowenstein Sandler PC, of Roseland, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was David L. Harris. Stephen N. Weiss, Moses & Singer LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Gregory J. Fleesler and Michael J. Pospis. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Judge Joel A. Pisano

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1095

JOYAL PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHNSON ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

JOHNSON ELECTRIC CONSULTING, INC.,

and JOHNSON ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTORY, LTD., Defendants-Appellants,

and

DELPHI CORPORATION,

Defendant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-5172 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED October 22, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Joyal Products, Inc. v. Johnson Electric North America, Inc., No. 09-1095 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 22, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1095-20091022
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1095-20091022

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.