Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cornish v. Doll, No. 09-1093 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1093
Decided
August 4, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1093

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

JOHN J. DOLL, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property

and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

HARRY I. MOATZ, Director of Office of Enrollment and Discipline, and WILLIAM J. GRIFFIN, Attorney, Office of Enrollment and Discipline,

Defendants-Appellees.

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, of Washington, DC, pro se. Sydney O. Johnson, Jr., Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and Ronald K. Jaicks, Associate Solicitor. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Richard W. Roberts

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1093

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JOHN J. DOLL, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property

and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

HARRY I. MOATZ, Director of Office of Enrollment and Discipline, and WILLIAM J. GRIFFIN, Attorney, Office of Enrollment and Discipline,

Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in CASE NO(S). 07-CV-1719 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and RADER, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R.36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED August 4, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cornish v. Doll, No. 09-1093 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1093-20090804
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1093-20090804

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.