Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Monsanto Co. v. David, No. 09-1078 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1078
Decided
October 14, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1078

MONSANTO COMPANY

and MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

LOREN DAVID,

Defendant-Appellant. Gregory H. Lantier, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Paul R.Q. Wolfson, Seth P. Waxman, and Shirley Cassin Woodward. Of counsel was Joseph C. Orlet, Husch2 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1078

MONSANTO COMPANY

and MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

LOREN DAVID,

Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in CASE NO(S). 4:04-CV-425 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LOURIE, LINN and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R.36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED October 14, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Footnotes

  1. Blackwell Sanders LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri. Bruce E. Johnson, Cutler Law Firm, P.C., of West Des Moines, Iowa, argued for defendant-appellant. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Judge Henry E. Autrey

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Monsanto Co. v. David, No. 09-1078 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1078-20091014
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1078-20091014

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.