Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bally Gaming Inc. v. IGT, No. 09-1072 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 22, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1072
Decided
October 22, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1072

BALLY GAMING, INC. (doing business as Bally Technologies),

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

IGT,

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee.

v.

SIERRA DESIGN GROUP,

Third Party Defendant. Amy H. Candido, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were Charles K. Verhoeven, Eric E. Wall, and Todd Kennedy. Jeffrey W. Sarles, Mayer Brown LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant/third party plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Nathaniel Hamstra and Andrea C. Hutchison. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Nevada Senior Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr.

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1072

BALLY GAMING, INC. (doing business as Bally Technologies), Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

IGT,

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SIERRA DESIGN GROUP,

Third Party Defendant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in CASE NO(S). 3:06-CV-0483 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, BRYSON and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED October 22, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bally Gaming Inc. v. IGT, No. 09-1072 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 22, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1072-20091022
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1072-20091022

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.