Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Peer Communications, Corp. v. Skype Technologies S.A., No. 09-1069 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1069
Decided
October 6, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1069

PEER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA, SKYPE, INC.,

and EBAY, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees. Michael T. Cooke, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jonathan T. Suder. Of counsel on the brief were Edward R. Nelson, III, and Steven W. Hartsell, Nelson Bumgardner Casto, P.C., of Fort Worth, Texas. Of counsel was Stephen D. Susman, Susman Godfrey L.L.P., of Houston, Texas.

Andrei Iancu, Irell & Manella LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Morgan Chu, Alan J. Heinrich and Benjamin T. Wang. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Judge Leonard Davis

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1069

PEER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA, SKYPE, INC.,

and EBAY, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

in CASE NO(S). 6:06-CV-370. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MAYER, RADER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED October 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Peer Communications, Corp. v. Skype Technologies S.A., No. 09-1069 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1069-20091006
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1069-20091006

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.