Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Conforti v. the Ocean Group, Inc., No. 09-1054 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 21, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1054
Decided
September 21, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1054

CARL J. CONFORTI,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

THE OCEAN GROUP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

TIMEX CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Carl M. DeFranco, Jr., Law Office of Carl M. DeFranco, of Belmont, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was Brett N. Dorny, Law Office of Brett N. Dorny, of Northborough, Massachusetts. David Lesht, Eugene M. Cummings, P.C., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for The Ocean Group, Inc. was Raymond M. Mehler, Cook Alex Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois. Robert D. Fine, Chace Ruttenberg & Freedman, LLP, of Providence, Rhode Island for defendant-appellee Timex Corporation. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Judge George A. O’Toole, Jr.

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1054

CARL J. CONFORTI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

THE OCEAN GROUP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee, and TIMEX CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in CASE NO(S). 06-CV-10513 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED September 21, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Conforti v. the Ocean Group, Inc., No. 09-1054 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 21, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1054-20090921
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1054-20090921

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.