Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bengis v. Moss, No. 09-1049 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1049
Decided
October 9, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1049

JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

RICHARD MOSS, ESQ. and

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP,

Defendants-Appellees.

Panagiota Betty Tufariello, Intellectulaw, The Law Offices of P.B. Tufariello, P.C., of Mount Sinai, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Jeffrey W. Davis, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Matthew B. Moses. Of counsel was Thomas H. Moreland. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Jed S. Rakoff

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1049

JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RICHARD MOSS, ESQ. and

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP

Defendants-Appellees.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-4237 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED October 9, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bengis v. Moss, No. 09-1049 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1049-20091009
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1049-20091009

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.