Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc., No. 09-1039 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1039
Decided
September 15, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1039

MICHAEL BOWLING,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

HASBRO, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Rachel K. Zimmerman, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief were Anthony R. Zeuli, Thomas J. Leach and Rachel C. Hughey. David K.S. Cornwell, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Justin T. Sher and Kevin W. McCabe. Of counsel on the brief were Jeffrey K. Techentin and Adam M. Ramos, Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C., of Providence, Rhode Island. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island Judge William E. Smith

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1039

MICHAEL BOWLING,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

HASBRO, Inc.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-229 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED September 15, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc., No. 09-1039 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1039-20090915
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1039-20090915

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.