Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Excel Innovations, Inc. v. YOU Tech. Inc., No. 08-1599 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1599
Decided
June 8, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1599

EXCEL INNOVATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

and

AVIV LLC and NED HOFFMAN,

Counterclaim Defendants,

v.

YOU TECHNOLOGY INC. (formerly known as YT ACQUISITION CORPORATION),

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee.

Gregory J. Charles, Campeau Goodsell Smith, of San Jose, California, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Jonathan H. Bornstein, Bornstein & Bornstein, of San Francisco, California. Mark S. Davies, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellee. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Maxine M. Chesney

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1599

EXCEL INNOVATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

and

AVIV LLC and NED HOFFMAN,

Counterclaim Defendants, v.

YOU TECHNOLOGY INC. (formerly known as YT ACQUISITION CORPORATION),

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in CASE NO(S). 03-CV-3125 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (GAJARSA, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED June 8, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Excel Innovations, Inc. v. YOU Tech. Inc., No. 08-1599 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1599-20090608
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1599-20090608

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.