Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Biolumix, Inc. v. Centrus International, Inc., No. 08-1589 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2009)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1589
Decided
May 7, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1589

BIOLUMIX, INC.,

GIDEON EDEN, and RUTH EDEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

CENTRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Peter M. Falkenstein, Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer & Weiss P.C., of Ann Arbor, Michigan, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief was David S. McDaniel, of Southfield, Michigan. Toni L. Harris, Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap, P.C., of Lansing, Michigan, argued for defendant-appellant. With her on the brief was Mark R. Fox. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Judge Arthur J. Tarnow

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1589

BIOLUMIX, INC.,

GIDEON EDEN, and RUTH EDEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

CENTRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan In CASE NO(S). 08-CV-11418. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 7, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Biolumix, Inc. v. Centrus International, Inc., No. 08-1589 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1589-20090507
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1589-20090507

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error