Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Comcast Cable Communications v. Finisar Corp., No. 08-1506 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1506
Decided
April 10, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1506

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

FINISAR CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant. David J. Silbert, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Daralyn J. Durie, and Ajay S. Krishnan. Larry R. Laycock, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for defendant-appellant. Of counsel were Charles L. Roberts, C.J. Veverka, and David R. Todd. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge William H. Alsup

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1506

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FINISAR CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in CASE NO 3:06-CV-04206. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (BRYSON, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.)

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.36

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: April 10, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Comcast Cable Communications v. Finisar Corp., No. 08-1506 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1506-20090410
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1506-20090410

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.