Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

RFR IND., Inc. v. Rex-Hide IND. Inc., No. 08-1399 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 4, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1399
Decided
December 4, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1399

RFR INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

REX-HIDE INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CENTURY STEPS, INC.

(doing business as Century Precast),

Third Party Defendant-Appellee. Robert G. Oake, Jr., Oake Law Office, of Allen, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Chris Flood, Flood & Flood, of Houston, Texas, for defendant/third party plaintiff-appellee. John R. Emerson, Haynes and Boone, LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for third party defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was William D. White. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Judge Ed Kinkeade

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1399

RFR INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

REX-HIDE INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CENTURY STEPS, INC.

(doing business as Century Precast), Third Party Defendant-Appellee. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 3:02-CV-1444. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LOURIE, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED December 4, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

RFR IND., Inc. v. Rex-Hide IND. Inc., No. 08-1399 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 4, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1399-20081204
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1399-20081204

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.