Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

EZ Gard Industries Inc. v. XO Athletic Co., No. 08-1384 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2008)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1384
Decided
December 15, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1384

EZ GARD INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

XO ATHLETIC CO.,

Defendant-Appellant, and

PAUL J. ANDRE,

Defendant. William L. Roberts, Faegre & Benson LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Kevin P. Wagner and Timothy E. Grimsrud. Stephen M. Chin, von Simson & Chin LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1384

EZ GARD INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

XO ATHLETIC CO.,

Defendant-Appellant. and PAUL J. ANDRE,

Defendant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in CASE NO(S). 07-CV-4769 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED December 15, 2008 / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

EZ Gard Industries Inc. v. XO Athletic Co., No. 08-1384 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1384-20081215
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1384-20081215

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error