Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., No. 08-1300 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1300
Decided
October 10, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1300

AMGEN INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH,

and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.,

Defendants-Appellants. Lloyd R. Day Jr., Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP, of Cupertino, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were David M. Madrid and Linda A. Sasaki-Baxley. Of counsel on the brief were Stuart L. Watt and Wendy A. Whiteford, Amgen Inc., of Thousand Oaks, California; and Cecilia H. Gonzalez and Margaret D. Macdonald, Howrey LLP, of Washington, DC.

Leora Ben-Ami, Kaye Scholer LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief were Thomas F. Fleming, Patricia A. Carson, Christopher T. Jagoe and Howard S. Suh. Of counsel on the brief were Lee Carl Bromberg and Julia Huston, Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel were Daniel Forchheimer, Matthew McFarlane, and Krista M. Rycroft, Kaye Scholer LLP, of New York, New York; and Timothy M. Murphy, Krista M. Rycroft, Kimberly J. Seluga, and Keith E. Toms, Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts.

Donald R. Ware, Foley Hoag LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, for amicus curiae Biotechnology Industry Organization. With him on the brief were Barbara A. Fiacco and Jeremy A. Younkin. Of counsel on the brief was Hans Sauer, Biotechnology Industry Organization, of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Judge William G. Young

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1300

AMGEN INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH,

and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.,

Defendants-Appellants. Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts In CASE NO(S). 05-CV-12237. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: _October 10, 2008__ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., No. 08-1300 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1300-20081010
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1300-20081010

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.