Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Digital Impact, Inc. v. Bigfoot Interactive, Inc., No. 08-1255 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2009)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1255
Decided
March 10, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1255, -1256

DIGITAL IMPACT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

BIGFOOT INTERACTIVE, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Thomas E. Moore, III, The Moore Law Group, of Palo Alto, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Arthur M. Dresner, Duane Morris LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Robert L. Byer, and Matthew C. Mousley, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1255, -1256

DIGITAL IMPACT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BIGFOOT INTERACTIVE, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-0636 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LOURIE, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED March 10, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Digital Impact, Inc. v. Bigfoot Interactive, Inc., No. 08-1255 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1255-20090310
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1255-20090310

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error