Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

MPT, Inc. v. U.S. Marathon Labels, Inc., No. 08-1222 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1222
Decided
March 10, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1222 MPT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARATHON LABELS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

POLYMERIC CONVERTING, LLC,

Defendant. Thomas H. Shunk, Baker & Hostetler LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Bruce H. Wilson, of Akron, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellant. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Judge Patricia A. Gaughan

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1222 MPT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

MARATHON LABELS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant, and

POLYMERIC CONVERTING, LLC,

Defendant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO in CASE NO(S). 1:04-CV-2357 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (SCHALL, ARCHER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED March 10, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MPT, Inc. v. U.S. Marathon Labels, Inc., No. 08-1222 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1222-20090310
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1222-20090310

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.