Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Celerity Inc. v. Ultra Clean Tech. Systems and Service, Inc., No. 08-1205 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1205
Decided
October 9, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1205

CELERITY, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v.

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant, and

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Keith L. Slenkovich, Thelen LLP, of San Jose, California, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Robert E. Camors, Jr., Christopher L. Ogden, Karin M. Frenza, and Tomomi K. Harkey.

Paul J. Andre, King & Spalding LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant and defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Lisa Kobialka and Amy Sun. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Maxine M. Chesney

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1205

CELERITY, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

v.

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant,

and

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of

California

in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-4374 and 05-CV-3560 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (GAJARSA, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: October 9, 2008 / s /Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Celerity Inc. v. Ultra Clean Tech. Systems and Service, Inc., No. 08-1205 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1205-20081009
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1205-20081009

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.