Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ninestar Tech. Co., Ltd. v. International Trade Commission, No. 08-1201 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2009)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1201
Decided
January 13, 2009
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1201

NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD.,

TOWN SKY, INC.,

Appellants,

and

DATAPRODUCTS USA, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

EPSON PORTLAND INC., EPSON AMERICA, INC., AND SEIKO EPSON

CORPORATION,

Intervenors. Edward F. O’Connor, The Eclipse Group LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for all appellants. Wayne W. Herrington, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Michael K. Haldenstein, Attorney. Harold A. Barza, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for intervenors. With him on the brief were Tigran Guledjian and Aaron B. Craig; and Sanford I. Weisburst, of New York, New York. Of counsel on the brief were Louis S. Mastriani and Michael L. Doane, Adduci, Mastriani, & Schaumberg L.L.P., of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States International Trade Commission

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1201

NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD.,

TOWN SKY, INC.,

Appellants,

and

DATAPRODUCTS USA, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee, and EPSON PORTLAND INC., EPSON AMERICA, INC., AND SEIKO EPSON

CORPORATION,

Intervenors. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States International Trade Commission in CASE NO(S). 337-TA-565 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED January 13, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ninestar Tech. Co., Ltd. v. International Trade Commission, No. 08-1201 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1201-20090113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1201-20090113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.