Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Lundahl, No. 08-1151 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1151
Decided
August 8, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1151

(Serial No. 09/326,405)

IN RE DAVE B. LUNDAHL

William W. Cochran, Cochran Freund & Young LLC, of Fort Collins, Colorado, argued for appellant. Of counsel was James R. Young. Benjamin D.M. Wood, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief was William LaMarca, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Sydney O. Johnson, Jr., Acting Solicitor. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1151

(Serial No. 09/326,405)

IN RE DAVE B. LUNDAHL

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent

Appeals and Interferences.

in CASE NO(S). 09/326,405 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges, and ILLSTON, District Judge∗).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED August 8, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

∗ Honorable Susan Illston, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Lundahl, No. 08-1151 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1151-20080808
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1151-20080808

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.