Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

1ST Tech. LLC. v. Rational Enterprises Ltda., No. 08-1132 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1132
Decided
October 8, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1132

1ST TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

RATIONAL ENTERPRISES LTDA. and RATIONAL POKER SCHOOL LIMITED,

Defendants, and

BODOG ENTERTAINMENT S.A.,

BODOG.NET, and BODOG.COM,

Defendants-Appellants.

Robert P. Greenspoon, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was William W. Flachsbart. Of counsel on the brief were L. Kristopher Rath, Kevin M. Sutehall, and Michael K. Wall, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, of Las Vegas, Nevada. Victor de Gyarfas, Foley & Lardner LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were James D. Nguyen, of Los Angeles, California, and George E. Quillin, of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Nevada Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1132

1ST TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RATIONAL ENTERPRISES LTDA. and RATIONAL POKER SCHOOL LIMITED, Defendants,

and

BODOG ENTERTAINMENT S.A.,

BODOG.NET, and BODOG.COM,

Defendants-Appellants.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for

the District of Nevada

in CASE NO(S). 2:06-CV-1110. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MAYER, LINN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.)

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: October 8, 2008 / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

1ST Tech. LLC. v. Rational Enterprises Ltda., No. 08-1132 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1132-20081008
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1132-20081008

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.