Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Informatica Corp. v. Business Objects Data Integration, Inc., No. 08-1123 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 17, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1123
Decided
November 17, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1123, -1137

INFORMATICA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v.

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC.

(formerly known as Acta Technology, Inc.),

Defendant-Appellant.

Lynn H. Pasahow, Fenwick & West, LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for the plaintiff-cross appellant. With her on the brief were J. David Hadden, Darren E. Donnelly, Carolyn Chang; and Heather N. Mewes and David D. Schumann, of San Francisco, California. Of counsel were David M. Lacy Kusters, Fenwick & West, LLP, of San Francisco, California and Ryan A. Tyz, Fenwick & West, LLP, of Mountain View, California. Daniel J. Furniss, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Gregory S. Gilchrist. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1123, -1137

INFORMATICA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,

v.

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC.

(formerly known as Acta Technology, Inc.),

Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California In CASE NO(S). 02-CV-03378. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, GAJARSA and PROST, Circuit Judges):

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATE:_November 17,2008_ __/s/ Jan_Horbaly______ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Informatica Corp. v. Business Objects Data Integration, Inc., No. 08-1123 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 17, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1123-20081117
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1123-20081117

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.