Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Venture IND. Corp. v. Autoliv ASP Inc., No. 08-1113 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1113
Decided
July 10, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1113

VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, and

VEMCO, INC., PATENT HOLDING COMPANY,

and LARRY J. WINGET,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.),

Defendant-Appellee.

John E. Anding, Drew Cooper & Anding, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Thomas V. Hubbard and Theodore J. Westbrook. Cyrus Amir-Mokri, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Peter E. Greene. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Senior Judge Avern Cohn

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1113

VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

VEMCO, INC., PATENT HOLDING COMPANY,

and LARRY J. WINGET,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Michigan

in CASE NO(S). 99-CV-75354 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (DYK, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 10, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Venture IND. Corp. v. Autoliv ASP Inc., No. 08-1113 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1113-20080710
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1113-20080710

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.