Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Luhn v. Scott, No. 08-1084 (Fed. Cir. July 11, 2008)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1084
Decided
July 11, 2008
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1084

HAROLD R. LUHN and LUTHER J. HUESKE,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

CECIL SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant, and

ARMOR PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant. Robert M. Bowick, Matthews, Lawson & Bowick, PLLC, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Rick B. Yeager, of Austin, Texas, argued for defendant-appellant. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Judge Lee Yeakel

2NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1084

HAROLD R. LUHN and LUTHER J. HUESKE,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CECIL SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

ARMOR PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-521 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LOURIE, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 11, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Luhn v. Scott, No. 08-1084 (Fed. Cir. July 11, 2008).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1084-20080711
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1084-20080711

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.